EUSB vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. EUSB offers more diversification with 3804 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: EUSB

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEUSBVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.12%0.03%
AUM$712M$663.5B
Dividend Yield3.95%1.07%
Holdings4,2083,543
YTD Return-0.21%+13.92%
1Y Return+2.13%+24.07%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.27%+20.88%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.17%+12.47%
Volatility (annualized)5.7%15.3%
Max Drawdown-18.3%-56.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
InceptionJun 23, 2020May 24, 2001

EUSB vs VTI Performance

iShares ESG Advanced Universal USD Bond ETF (EUSB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EUSB returned +2.13% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, EUSB is down 0.21% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.

Over three years, EUSB compounded at +4.27% per year against +20.88% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.17% and +12.47% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 5.7% for EUSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for EUSB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EUSB charges 0.12% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EUSB currently yields 3.95% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

EUSB and VTI share 4 holdings out of 6583 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EUSBWeight in VTIDifference
LRCX0.00%0.74%0.74%
AON0.01%0.09%0.08%
KDP0.01%0.06%0.05%
HUBBProProPro
See all 4 holdings EUSB shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EUSB or VTI?

EUSB has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.

Which performed better, EUSB or VTI?

Over the past year EUSB returned +2.13% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EUSB annualized +0.00% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, EUSB or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 5.7% for EUSB. Worst drawdown: EUSB -18.3% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both EUSB and VTI?

EUSB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between EUSB and VTI?

EUSB and VTI share 4 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 6583 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, EUSB or VTI?

EUSB yields 3.95% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EUSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →