VT vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VT offers more diversification with 8926 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTMore Diversified: VT

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.06%0.03%
AUM$77.6B$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.61%1.07%
Holdings10,1333,543
YTD Return+10.34%+10.14%
1Y Return+22.06%+19.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.21%+18.94%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.58%+11.79%
Volatility (annualized)16.6%15.4%
Max Drawdown-50.6%-56.6%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 24, 2008May 24, 2001

VT vs VTI Performance

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VT returned +22.06% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, VT is up 10.34% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.

Over three years, VT compounded at +18.21% per year against +18.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.58% and +11.79% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +7.99% annualized vs +7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.6% for VT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VT charges 0.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VT currently yields 1.61% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

54.0%overlap

VT and VTI share 1214 holdings out of 10495 unique holdings combined, representing a 54.0% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VTWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA4.14%6.32%2.18%
AAPL3.47%5.84%2.37%
MSFT2.68%3.81%1.13%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
LLYProProPro
See all 10 holdings VT shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VT or VTI?

VT has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VT or VTI?

Over the past year VT returned +22.06% vs +19.82% for VTI, so VT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), VT annualized +7.17% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VT or VTI?

VT has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VT -50.6% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both VT and VTI?

VT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between VT and VTI?

VT and VTI share 1214 common holdings with a 54.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 10495 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VT or VTI?

VT yields 1.61% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →