EUSB vs QQQ
EUSB vs QQQ
iShares ESG Advanced Universal USD Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
EUSB has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. EUSB offers more diversification with 3804 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EUSB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $712M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.95% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 4,208 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.46% | +12.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.76% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.11% | +22.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.22% | +14.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EUSB vs QQQ Performance
iShares ESG Advanced Universal USD Bond ETF (EUSB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EUSB returned +2.76% while QQQ returned +22.35%. Year to date, EUSB is down 0.46% versus a gain of 12.48% for QQQ.
Over three years, EUSB compounded at +4.11% per year against +22.30% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.22% and +14.24% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs -0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.7% for EUSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for EUSB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EUSB charges 0.12% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $18 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EUSB currently yields 3.95% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EUSB or QQQ?
EUSB has an expense ratio of 0.12% while QQQ charges 0.18%. EUSB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EUSB or QQQ?
Over the past year EUSB returned +2.76% vs +22.35% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EUSB annualized -0.04% vs +12.91% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EUSB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.7% for EUSB. Worst drawdown: EUSB -18.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EUSB and QQQ?
EUSB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EUSB and QQQ?
EUSB and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3905 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EUSB or QQQ?
EUSB yields 3.95% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so EUSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.