EDF vs VTI
EDF vs VTI
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $162M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.31% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.37% | +11.83% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.50% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.81% | +20.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.38% | +11.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 23, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
EDF vs VTI Performance
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDF returned +17.50% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, EDF is up 13.37% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.
Over three years, EDF compounded at +18.81% per year against +20.40% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.38% and +11.96% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs -5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.8% for EDF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDF charges 2.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $256 vs $3 annually, a gap of $253 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDF currently yields 14.31% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EDF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2822 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDF or VTI?
EDF has an expense ratio of 2.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $253 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDF or VTI?
Over the past year EDF returned +17.50% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDF annualized -5.02% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDF or VTI?
EDF has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EDF -83.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EDF and VTI?
EDF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDF and VTI?
EDF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2822 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDF or VTI?
EDF yields 14.31% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.