EDF vs IVV
EDF vs IVV
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $162M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.31% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.15% | +13.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.28% | +23.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.04% | +21.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.32% | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 23, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
EDF vs IVV Performance
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EDF returned +17.28% while IVV returned +23.63%. Year to date, EDF is up 13.15% versus a gain of 13.52% for IVV.
Over three years, EDF compounded at +18.04% per year against +21.26% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +4.32% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -5.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.8% for EDF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDF charges 2.56% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $256 vs $3 annually, a gap of $253 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDF currently yields 14.31% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EDF and IVV share 0 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDF or IVV?
EDF has an expense ratio of 2.56% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $253 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDF or IVV?
Over the past year EDF returned +17.28% vs +23.63% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDF annualized -5.03% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDF or IVV?
EDF has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EDF -83.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EDF and IVV?
EDF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDF and IVV?
EDF and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDF or IVV?
EDF yields 14.31% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.