EDF vs VYM
EDF vs VYM
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDF | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.56% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $162M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.31% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +13.37% | +13.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.50% | +24.08% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.81% | +17.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.38% | +12.13% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 23, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EDF vs VYM Performance
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDF returned +17.50% while VYM returned +24.08%. Year to date, EDF is up 13.37% versus a gain of 13.82% for VYM.
Over three years, EDF compounded at +18.81% per year against +17.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +4.38% and +12.13% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.8% for EDF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDF charges 2.56% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $256 vs $4 annually, a gap of $252 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDF currently yields 14.31% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EDF and VYM share 0 holdings out of 597 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDF or VYM?
EDF has an expense ratio of 2.56% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $252 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDF or VYM?
Over the past year EDF returned +17.50% vs +24.08% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDF annualized -5.02% vs +6.98% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDF or VYM?
EDF has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EDF -83.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EDF and VYM?
EDF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDF and VYM?
EDF and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 597 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDF or VYM?
EDF yields 14.31% while VYM yields 2.86%, so EDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.