EDF vs QQQ
EDF vs QQQ
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDF | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.56% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $162M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.31% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.15% | +12.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.97% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.52% | +22.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.47% | +14.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 23, 2010 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EDF vs QQQ Performance
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EDF returned +17.97% while QQQ returned +22.35%. Year to date, EDF is up 13.15% versus a gain of 12.48% for QQQ.
Over three years, EDF compounded at +17.52% per year against +22.30% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +4.47% and +14.24% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs -5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 25.7% for EDF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.8% for EDF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDF charges 2.56% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $256 vs $18 annually, a gap of $238 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDF currently yields 14.31% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EDF and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 142 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDF or QQQ?
EDF has an expense ratio of 2.56% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $238 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDF or QQQ?
Over the past year EDF returned +17.97% vs +22.35% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDF annualized -5.04% vs +12.91% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 25.7% for EDF. Worst drawdown: EDF -83.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EDF and QQQ?
EDF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDF and QQQ?
EDF and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 142 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDF or QQQ?
EDF yields 14.31% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so EDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.