EDF vs VOO
EDF vs VOO
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $162M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.31% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.15% | +13.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.28% | +23.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.04% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.32% | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 23, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EDF vs VOO Performance
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDF returned +17.28% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, EDF is up 13.15% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.
Over three years, EDF compounded at +18.04% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.32% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs -5.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.8% for EDF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDF charges 2.56% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $256 vs $3 annually, a gap of $253 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDF currently yields 14.31% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EDF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDF or VOO?
EDF has an expense ratio of 2.56% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $253 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDF or VOO?
Over the past year EDF returned +17.28% vs +23.65% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDF annualized -5.03% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDF or VOO?
EDF has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EDF -83.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EDF and VOO?
EDF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDF and VOO?
EDF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDF or VOO?
EDF yields 14.31% while VOO yields 1.09%, so EDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.