EMNT vs VTI
EMNT vs VTI
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMNT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.24% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $212M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.05% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 225 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.05% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.98% | +24.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.05% | +20.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.51% | +12.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 10, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
EMNT vs VTI Performance
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) is a ETF from PIMCO (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMNT returned +3.98% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, EMNT is up 2.05% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.
Over three years, EMNT compounded at +5.05% per year against +20.88% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.51% and +12.47% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 1.2% for EMNT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.4% for EMNT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMNT charges 0.24% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $24 vs $3 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMNT currently yields 4.05% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EMNT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2903 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMNT or VTI?
EMNT has an expense ratio of 0.24% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMNT or VTI?
Over the past year EMNT returned +3.98% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), EMNT annualized +2.78% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMNT or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 1.2% for EMNT. Worst drawdown: EMNT -2.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EMNT and VTI?
EMNT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMNT and VTI?
EMNT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2903 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMNT or VTI?
EMNT yields 4.05% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EMNT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.