EMNT vs VOO
EMNT vs VOO
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMNT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.24% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $212M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.05% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 225 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.07% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.98% | +24.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.05% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.51% | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 10, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EMNT vs VOO Performance
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) is a ETF from PIMCO (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMNT returned +3.98% while VOO returned +24.01%. Year to date, EMNT is up 2.07% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, EMNT compounded at +5.05% per year against +21.17% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.51% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 1.2% for EMNT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.4% for EMNT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMNT charges 0.24% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $24 vs $3 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMNT currently yields 4.05% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EMNT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 625 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMNT or VOO?
EMNT has an expense ratio of 0.24% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMNT or VOO?
Over the past year EMNT returned +3.98% vs +24.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), EMNT annualized +2.78% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMNT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 1.2% for EMNT. Worst drawdown: EMNT -2.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMNT and VOO?
EMNT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMNT and VOO?
EMNT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 625 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMNT or VOO?
EMNT yields 4.05% while VOO yields 1.09%, so EMNT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.