EMNT vs VXUS
EMNT vs VXUS
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMNT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.24% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $212M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.05% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 225 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.05% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.98% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.05% | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.51% | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 10, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EMNT vs VXUS Performance
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) is a ETF from PIMCO (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMNT returned +3.98% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, EMNT is up 2.05% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, EMNT compounded at +5.05% per year against +18.63% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.51% and +9.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.80% annualized vs +2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.2% for EMNT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.4% for EMNT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMNT charges 0.24% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $24 vs $5 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMNT currently yields 4.05% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EMNT and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7980 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMNT or VXUS?
EMNT has an expense ratio of 0.24% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $19 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMNT or VXUS?
Over the past year EMNT returned +3.98% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), EMNT annualized +2.78% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMNT or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.2% for EMNT. Worst drawdown: EMNT -2.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EMNT and VXUS?
EMNT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMNT and VXUS?
EMNT and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7980 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMNT or VXUS?
EMNT yields 4.05% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so EMNT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.