AGRW vs VTI
AGRW vs VTI
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGRW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $108M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.83% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.22% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
AGRW vs VTI Performance
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGRW returned +14.22% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, AGRW is up 9.83% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for AGRW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGRW charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGRW currently yields 0.12% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AGRW and VTI share 43 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AGRW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 15.12% | 6.32% | 8.80% |
| GOOG | 8.56% | 2.27% | 6.29% |
| AAPL | 4.72% | 5.84% | 1.12% |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MSFT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LLY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| V | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MU | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings AGRW shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGRW or VTI?
AGRW has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGRW or VTI?
Over the past year AGRW returned +14.22% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AGRW annualized +24.46% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGRW or VTI?
AGRW has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AGRW -16.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AGRW and VTI?
AGRW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between AGRW and VTI?
AGRW and VTI share 43 common holdings with a 34.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGRW or VTI?
AGRW yields 0.12% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.