AGRW vs VXUS
AGRW vs VXUS
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGRW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $108M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +9.83% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.22% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
AGRW vs VXUS Performance
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGRW returned +14.22% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, AGRW is up 9.83% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for AGRW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGRW charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGRW currently yields 0.12% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
AGRW and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7908 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGRW or VXUS?
AGRW has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGRW or VXUS?
Over the past year AGRW returned +14.22% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AGRW annualized +24.46% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGRW or VXUS?
AGRW has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: AGRW -16.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both AGRW and VXUS?
AGRW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGRW and VXUS?
AGRW and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7908 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGRW or VXUS?
AGRW yields 0.12% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.