AGRW vs VYM
AGRW vs VYM
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGRW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $108M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +9.83% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.22% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
AGRW vs VYM Performance
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGRW returned +14.22% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, AGRW is up 9.83% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for AGRW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGRW charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGRW currently yields 0.12% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
AGRW and VYM share 5 holdings out of 602 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AGRW | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 5.26% | 6.47% | 1.21% |
| WMT | 0.93% | 2.44% | 1.51% |
| UNH | 1.13% | 1.17% | 0.04% |
| ADI | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 5 holdings AGRW shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGRW or VYM?
AGRW has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGRW or VYM?
Over the past year AGRW returned +14.22% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AGRW annualized +24.46% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGRW or VYM?
AGRW has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AGRW -16.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both AGRW and VYM?
AGRW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGRW and VYM?
AGRW and VYM share 5 common holdings with a 8.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 602 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGRW or VYM?
AGRW yields 0.12% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.