AGGA vs VTI
AGGA vs VTI
EA Astoria Beacon Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGGA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $93M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.24% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.85% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.99% | +24.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
AGGA vs VTI Performance
EA Astoria Beacon Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) is a ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGGA returned +2.99% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, AGGA is up 0.85% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 1.9% for AGGA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for AGGA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGGA charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGGA currently yields 4.24% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AGGA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2799 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGGA or VTI?
AGGA has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGGA or VTI?
Over the past year AGGA returned +2.99% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AGGA annualized +4.18% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGGA or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 1.9% for AGGA. Worst drawdown: AGGA -1.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AGGA and VTI?
AGGA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGGA and VTI?
AGGA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2799 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGGA or VTI?
AGGA yields 4.24% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AGGA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.