AGGA vs IVV
AGGA vs IVV
EA Astoria Beacon Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGGA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $93M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.24% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.37% | +13.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.42% | +22.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
AGGA vs IVV Performance
EA Astoria Beacon Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) is a ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AGGA returned +2.42% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, AGGA is up 0.37% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.9% for AGGA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for AGGA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGGA charges 0.55% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGGA currently yields 4.24% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AGGA and IVV share 0 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGGA or IVV?
AGGA has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGGA or IVV?
Over the past year AGGA returned +2.42% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AGGA annualized +3.77% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGGA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.9% for AGGA. Worst drawdown: AGGA -1.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AGGA and IVV?
AGGA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGGA and IVV?
AGGA and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGGA or IVV?
AGGA yields 4.24% while IVV yields 1.09%, so AGGA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.