AGGA vs QQQ
AGGA vs QQQ
EA Astoria Beacon Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGGA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $93M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.24% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.87% | +17.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.03% | +28.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.86% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
AGGA vs QQQ Performance
EA Astoria Beacon Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) is a ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year AGGA returned +3.03% while QQQ returned +28.64%. Year to date, AGGA is up 0.87% versus a gain of 17.27% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 1.9% for AGGA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for AGGA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGGA charges 0.55% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $18 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGGA currently yields 4.24% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
AGGA and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 119 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGGA or QQQ?
AGGA has an expense ratio of 0.55% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGGA or QQQ?
Over the past year AGGA returned +3.03% vs +28.64% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AGGA annualized +4.19% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGGA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 1.9% for AGGA. Worst drawdown: AGGA -1.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both AGGA and QQQ?
AGGA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGGA and QQQ?
AGGA and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 119 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGGA or QQQ?
AGGA yields 4.24% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so AGGA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.