ACGR vs VXUS
ACGR vs VXUS
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACGR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $10M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +8.09% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.18% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.50% | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.47% | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
ACGR vs VXUS Performance
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is a ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACGR returned +15.18% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, ACGR is up 8.09% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, ACGR compounded at +19.50% per year against +18.63% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +11.47% and +9.05% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, ACGR has the edge at +12.11% annualized vs +4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACGR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACGR charges 0.39% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $5 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.12% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
ACGR and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7953 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACGR or VXUS?
ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACGR or VXUS?
Over the past year ACGR returned +15.18% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ACGR annualized +12.11% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACGR or VXUS?
ACGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: ACGR -34.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both ACGR and VXUS?
ACGR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and VXUS?
ACGR and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7953 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or VXUS?
ACGR yields 0.12% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.