ACGR vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACGRIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%
AUM$10M$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.12%1.09%
Holdings84508
YTD Return+8.03%+13.80%
1Y Return+14.88%+23.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.60%+21.49%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.43%+13.43%
Volatility (annualized)19.5%15.1%
Max Drawdown-34.5%-56.5%
Fund FamilyAmerican Century InvestmentsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 29, 2021May 15, 2000

ACGR vs IVV Performance

American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is a ETF from American Century Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ACGR returned +14.88% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, ACGR is up 8.03% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.

Over three years, ACGR compounded at +19.60% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.43% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, ACGR has the edge at +12.07% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ACGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACGR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACGR charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.12% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

42.2%overlap

ACGR and IVV share 69 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 42.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACGRWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA13.38%7.76%5.62%
GOOGL11.90%3.15%8.75%
AAPL3.61%7.44%3.83%
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
AMZNProProPro
LLYProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MAProProPro
See all 10 holdings ACGR shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACGR or IVV?

ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ACGR or IVV?

Over the past year ACGR returned +14.88% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ACGR annualized +12.07% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ACGR or IVV?

ACGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ACGR -34.5% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both ACGR and IVV?

ACGR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and IVV?

ACGR and IVV share 69 common holdings with a 42.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or IVV?

ACGR yields 0.12% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →