ACGR vs SPY

Quick Verdict

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: SPYMore Diversified: SPY

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACGRSPYWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.09%
AUM$10M$789.1B
Dividend Yield0.12%1.01%
Holdings84505
YTD Return+8.28%+13.28%
1Y Return+16.21%+23.94%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.56%+21.07%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.36%+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)19.5%15.3%
Max Drawdown-34.5%-56.5%
Fund FamilyAmerican Century InvestmentsState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 29, 2021Jan 22, 1993

ACGR vs SPY Performance

American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is a ETF from American Century Investments and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year ACGR returned +16.21% while SPY returned +23.94%. Year to date, ACGR is up 8.28% versus a gain of 13.28% for SPY.

Over three years, ACGR compounded at +19.56% per year against +21.07% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +11.36% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, ACGR has the edge at +12.14% annualized vs +8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ACGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACGR and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACGR charges 0.39% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $9 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.12% against 1.01% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

43.2%overlap

ACGR and SPY share 71 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 43.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACGRWeight in SPYDifference
NVDA13.38%7.31%6.07%
GOOGL11.90%3.32%8.58%
AAPL3.61%7.09%3.48%
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
AMZNProProPro
LLYProProPro
TSLAProProPro
METAProProPro
MAProProPro
See all 10 holdings ACGR shares with SPY
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACGR or SPY?

ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ACGR or SPY?

Over the past year ACGR returned +16.21% vs +23.94% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ACGR annualized +12.14% vs +8.84% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ACGR or SPY?

ACGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: ACGR -34.5% vs SPY -56.5%.

Should I hold both ACGR and SPY?

ACGR and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and SPY?

ACGR and SPY share 71 common holdings with a 43.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or SPY?

ACGR yields 0.12% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →