ACGR vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACGRVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%
AUM$10M$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.12%1.09%
Holdings84509
YTD Return+8.03%+13.80%
1Y Return+14.88%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.60%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.43%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)19.5%14.1%
Max Drawdown-34.5%-34.3%
Fund FamilyAmerican Century InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 29, 2021Sep 7, 2010

ACGR vs VOO Performance

American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is a ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACGR returned +14.88% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, ACGR is up 8.03% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, ACGR compounded at +19.60% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.43% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ACGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACGR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACGR charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.12% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

43.4%overlap

ACGR and VOO share 72 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 43.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACGRWeight in VOODifference
NVDA13.38%7.51%5.87%
GOOGL11.90%3.25%8.65%
AAPL3.61%6.59%2.98%
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
AMZNProProPro
LLYProProPro
TSLAProProPro
METAProProPro
MAProProPro
See all 10 holdings ACGR shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACGR or VOO?

ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ACGR or VOO?

Over the past year ACGR returned +14.88% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ACGR annualized +12.07% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ACGR or VOO?

ACGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ACGR -34.5% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both ACGR and VOO?

ACGR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and VOO?

ACGR and VOO share 72 common holdings with a 43.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or VOO?

ACGR yields 0.12% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →