RPG vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RPG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: RPGMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRPGVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%
AUM$2.0B$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.14%1.07%
Holdings683,543
YTD Return+23.44%+14.20%
1Y Return+26.16%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.69%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.78%+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)18.7%15.3%
Max Drawdown-53.7%-56.6%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMar 1, 2006May 24, 2001

RPG vs VTI Performance

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RPG returned +26.16% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, RPG is up 23.44% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, RPG compounded at +23.69% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.78% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RPG has the edge at +11.27% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for RPG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RPG charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RPG currently yields 0.14% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

19.4%overlap

RPG and VTI share 61 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RPGWeight in VTIDifference
SNDK9.61%0.46%9.15%
NVDA1.40%6.32%4.92%
MU4.27%1.79%2.48%
MSFTProProPro
AMDProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
FIXProProPro
KLACProProPro
LLYProProPro
See all 10 holdings RPG shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RPG or VTI?

RPG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RPG or VTI?

Over the past year RPG returned +26.16% vs +24.16% for VTI, so RPG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RPG annualized +11.27% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RPG or VTI?

RPG has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RPG -53.7% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both RPG and VTI?

RPG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between RPG and VTI?

RPG and VTI share 61 common holdings with a 19.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RPG or VTI?

RPG yields 0.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →