RPG vs SCHD
RPG vs SCHD
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RPG | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +23.44% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.16% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.69% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.78% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2006 | Oct 20, 2011 |
RPG vs SCHD Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RPG returned +26.16% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, RPG is up 23.44% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, RPG compounded at +23.69% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +8.78% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for RPG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RPG charges 0.35% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $6 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RPG currently yields 0.14% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
RPG and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 166 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RPG or SCHD?
RPG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RPG or SCHD?
Over the past year RPG returned +26.16% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), RPG annualized +11.27% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RPG or SCHD?
RPG has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RPG -53.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both RPG and SCHD?
RPG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RPG and SCHD?
RPG and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 166 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RPG or SCHD?
RPG yields 0.14% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.