RPG vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. RPG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: RPGMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRPGVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%
AUM$2.0B$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.14%1.09%
Holdings68509
YTD Return+23.44%+13.80%
1Y Return+26.16%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.69%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.78%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)18.7%14.1%
Max Drawdown-53.7%-34.3%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMar 1, 2006Sep 7, 2010

RPG vs VOO Performance

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RPG returned +26.16% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, RPG is up 23.44% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, RPG compounded at +23.69% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.78% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for RPG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RPG charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RPG currently yields 0.14% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

21.3%overlap

RPG and VOO share 65 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RPGWeight in VOODifference
SNDK9.61%0.52%9.09%
NVDA1.40%7.51%6.11%
MU4.27%2.02%2.25%
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AMDProProPro
KLACProProPro
FIXProProPro
GOOGProProPro
See all 10 holdings RPG shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RPG or VOO?

RPG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RPG or VOO?

Over the past year RPG returned +26.16% vs +23.71% for VOO, so RPG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RPG annualized +11.27% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RPG or VOO?

RPG has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RPG -53.7% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both RPG and VOO?

RPG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between RPG and VOO?

RPG and VOO share 65 common holdings with a 21.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RPG or VOO?

RPG yields 0.14% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →