IVV vs RPG

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. RPG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: RPGMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVRPGWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.35%
AUM$865.2B$2.0B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.14%
Holdings50868
YTD Return+13.80%+23.44%
1Y Return+23.70%+26.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+23.69%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+8.78%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%18.7%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-53.7%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Mar 1, 2006

IVV vs RPG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while RPG returned +26.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 23.44% for RPG.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +23.69% for RPG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +8.78% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RPG has the edge at +11.27% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -53.7% for RPG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while RPG charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.14% for RPG.

Holdings Overlap

18.9%overlap

IVV and RPG share 62 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in RPGDifference
SNDK0.36%9.61%9.25%
NVDA7.76%1.40%6.36%
MU1.69%4.27%2.58%
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AMDProProPro
FIXProProPro
KLACProProPro
GOOGProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with RPG
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or RPG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RPG charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or RPG?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +26.16% for RPG, so RPG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +11.27% for RPG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or RPG?

RPG has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RPG -53.7%.

Should I hold both IVV and RPG?

IVV and RPG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RPG?

IVV and RPG share 62 common holdings with a 18.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RPG?

IVV yields 1.09% while RPG yields 0.14%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →