RNP vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRNPVTIWinner
Expense Ratio1.78%0.03%
AUM$2,650.69$663.5B
Dividend Yield7.44%1.07%
Holdings3113,543
YTD Return+7.58%+11.83%
1Y Return+0.62%+21.79%
3Y Return (annualized)+10.42%+20.40%
5Y Return (annualized)+3.34%+11.96%
Volatility (annualized)27.4%15.3%
Max Drawdown-90.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionJun 27, 2003May 24, 2001

RNP vs VTI Performance

Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred and Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNP returned +0.62% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, RNP is up 7.58% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.

Over three years, RNP compounded at +10.42% per year against +20.40% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.34% and +11.96% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs +1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RNP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.8% for RNP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RNP charges 1.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $3 annually, a gap of $175 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNP currently yields 7.44% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

1.9%overlap

RNP and VTI share 30 holdings out of 2959 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RNPWeight in VTIDifference
WELL10.42%0.22%10.20%
DLR6.76%0.09%6.67%
AMT5.11%0.10%5.01%
CCIProProPro
PLDProProPro
EXRProProPro
EQIXProProPro
KIMProProPro
IRMProProPro
ELSProProPro
See all 10 holdings RNP shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RNP or VTI?

RNP has an expense ratio of 1.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $175 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RNP or VTI?

Over the past year RNP returned +0.62% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), RNP annualized +1.11% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RNP or VTI?

RNP has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RNP -90.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both RNP and VTI?

RNP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RNP and VTI?

RNP and VTI share 30 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2959 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RNP or VTI?

RNP yields 7.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RNP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →