IVV vs RNP

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVRNPWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%1.78%
AUM$865.2B$2,650.69
Dividend Yield1.09%7.44%
Holdings508311
YTD Return+13.52%+7.58%
1Y Return+23.63%+0.62%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.26%+10.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.52%+3.45%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%27.4%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-90.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Cohen & Steers Funds
CategoryEquityAllocation/Balanced
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jun 27, 2003

IVV vs RNP Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred and Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while RNP returned +0.62%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 7.58% for RNP.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.26% per year against +10.27% for RNP; over five years the annualized figures are +13.52% and +3.45% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RNP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -90.8% for RNP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while RNP charges 1.78%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $178 annually, a gap of $175 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 7.44% for RNP.

Holdings Overlap

2.2%overlap

IVV and RNP share 23 holdings out of 688 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in RNPDifference
WELL0.27%10.42%10.15%
DLR0.10%6.76%6.66%
AMT0.12%5.11%4.99%
CCIProProPro
PLDProProPro
EXRProProPro
EQIXProProPro
KIMProProPro
IRMProProPro
PSAProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with RNP
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or RNP?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RNP charges 1.78%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $175 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or RNP?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +0.62% for RNP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +1.11% for RNP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or RNP?

RNP has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RNP -90.8%.

Should I hold both IVV and RNP?

IVV and RNP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RNP?

IVV and RNP share 23 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 688 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RNP?

IVV yields 1.09% while RNP yields 7.44%, so RNP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →