RNP vs VXUS
RNP vs VXUS
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred and Income Fund, Inc. vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.78% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2,650.69 | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.44% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 311 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +8.05% | +13.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.61% | +28.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.42% | +18.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.34% | +9.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2003 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RNP vs VXUS Performance
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred and Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNP returned +0.61% while VXUS returned +28.53%. Year to date, RNP is up 8.05% versus a gain of 13.65% for VXUS.
Over three years, RNP compounded at +10.42% per year against +18.64% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.34% and +9.00% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.81% annualized vs +1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RNP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.8% for RNP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNP charges 1.78% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $5 annually, a gap of $173 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNP currently yields 7.44% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNP or VXUS?
RNP has an expense ratio of 1.78% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $173 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RNP or VXUS?
Over the past year RNP returned +0.61% vs +28.53% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RNP annualized +1.13% vs +4.81% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RNP or VXUS?
RNP has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RNP -90.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RNP and VXUS?
RNP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RNP and VXUS?
RNP and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8064 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNP or VXUS?
RNP yields 7.44% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so RNP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.