RNP vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRNPVYMWinner
Expense Ratio1.78%0.04%
AUM$2,650.69$79.0B
Dividend Yield7.44%2.86%
Holdings311568
YTD Return+8.10%+15.80%
1Y Return+1.07%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+10.56%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+3.15%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)27.4%14.6%
Max Drawdown-90.8%-58.8%
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionJun 27, 2003Nov 10, 2006

RNP vs VYM Performance

Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred and Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNP returned +1.07% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, RNP is up 8.10% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, RNP compounded at +10.56% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +3.15% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RNP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.8% for RNP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RNP charges 1.78% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $178 vs $4 annually, a gap of $174 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNP currently yields 7.44% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

1.1%overlap

RNP and VYM share 6 holdings out of 758 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RNPWeight in VYMDifference
NEE0.42%0.86%0.44%
C0.25%0.81%0.56%
FITB0.32%0.20%0.12%
MTBProProPro
FHNProProPro
CRBGProProPro
See all 6 holdings RNP shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RNP or VYM?

RNP has an expense ratio of 1.78% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $174 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RNP or VYM?

Over the past year RNP returned +1.07% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RNP annualized +1.13% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RNP or VYM?

RNP has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RNP -90.8% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both RNP and VYM?

RNP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RNP and VYM?

RNP and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 758 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RNP or VYM?

RNP yields 7.44% while VYM yields 2.86%, so RNP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →