RLTY vs VYM
RLTY vs VYM
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RLTY | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.19% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $260M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.57% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 232 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +13.92% | +13.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.40% | +23.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.57% | +16.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
RLTY vs VYM Performance
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund (RLTY) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RLTY returned +13.40% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, RLTY is up 13.92% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.
Over three years, RLTY compounded at +12.57% per year against +16.97% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.96% annualized vs +3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RLTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for RLTY and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RLTY charges 1.19% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $119 vs $4 annually, a gap of $115 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RLTY currently yields 7.57% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
RLTY and VYM share 5 holdings out of 722 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RLTY | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | 0.23% | 0.81% | 0.58% |
| PR | 0.94% | 0.06% | 0.88% |
| NEE | 0.14% | 0.86% | 0.72% |
| MTB | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| VOYA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 5 holdings RLTY shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RLTY or VYM?
RLTY has an expense ratio of 1.19% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $115 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RLTY or VYM?
Over the past year RLTY returned +13.40% vs +23.76% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), RLTY annualized +3.69% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RLTY or VYM?
RLTY has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RLTY -35.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both RLTY and VYM?
RLTY and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RLTY and VYM?
RLTY and VYM share 5 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 722 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RLTY or VYM?
RLTY yields 7.57% while VYM yields 2.86%, so RLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.