RLTY vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRLTYVOOWinner
Expense Ratio1.19%0.03%
AUM$260M$979.0B
Dividend Yield7.57%1.09%
Holdings232509
YTD Return+13.49%+13.53%
1Y Return+12.53%+23.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.47%+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.52%
Volatility (annualized)23.3%14.1%
Max Drawdown-35.4%-34.3%
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionFeb 24, 2022Sep 7, 2010

RLTY vs VOO Performance

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund (RLTY) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RLTY returned +12.53% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, RLTY is up 13.49% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.

Over three years, RLTY compounded at +13.47% per year against +21.27% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +3.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RLTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for RLTY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RLTY charges 1.19% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $119 vs $3 annually, a gap of $116 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RLTY currently yields 7.57% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

1.7%overlap

RLTY and VOO share 18 holdings out of 656 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RLTYWeight in VOODifference
WELL15.93%0.25%15.68%
DLR10.68%0.09%10.59%
CCI8.88%0.05%8.83%
AMTProProPro
PLDProProPro
EQIXProProPro
EXRProProPro
IRMProProPro
HSTProProPro
PSAProProPro
See all 10 holdings RLTY shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RLTY or VOO?

RLTY has an expense ratio of 1.19% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $116 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RLTY or VOO?

Over the past year RLTY returned +12.53% vs +23.65% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), RLTY annualized +3.59% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RLTY or VOO?

RLTY has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RLTY -35.4% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both RLTY and VOO?

RLTY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RLTY and VOO?

RLTY and VOO share 18 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 656 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RLTY or VOO?

RLTY yields 7.57% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →