RLTY vs VXUS
RLTY vs VXUS
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RLTY | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.19% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $260M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.57% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 232 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +13.92% | +11.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.40% | +27.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.57% | +17.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RLTY vs VXUS Performance
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund (RLTY) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RLTY returned +13.40% while VXUS returned +27.13%. Year to date, RLTY is up 13.92% versus a gain of 11.13% for VXUS.
Over three years, RLTY compounded at +12.57% per year against +17.24% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.66% annualized vs +3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RLTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for RLTY and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RLTY charges 1.19% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $119 vs $5 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RLTY currently yields 7.57% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RLTY and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 8026 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RLTY or VXUS?
RLTY has an expense ratio of 1.19% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $114 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RLTY or VXUS?
Over the past year RLTY returned +13.40% vs +27.13% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), RLTY annualized +3.69% vs +4.66% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RLTY or VXUS?
RLTY has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RLTY -35.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RLTY and VXUS?
RLTY and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RLTY and VXUS?
RLTY and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8026 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RLTY or VXUS?
RLTY yields 7.57% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so RLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.