QQQ vs RLTY
QQQ vs RLTY
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. RLTY offers more diversification with 169 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RLTY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.19% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $260M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 7.57% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 232 | |
| YTD Return | +12.48% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | +13.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.30% | +12.57% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.24% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 23.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -35.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Cohen & Steers Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Feb 24, 2022 |
QQQ vs RLTY Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund (RLTY) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.35% while RLTY returned +13.40%. Year to date, QQQ is up 12.48% versus a gain of 13.92% for RLTY.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +22.30% per year against +12.57% for RLTY. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs +3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 23.5% for RLTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -35.4% for RLTY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RLTY charges 1.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $119 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 7.57% for RLTY.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RLTY share 0 holdings out of 272 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RLTY?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RLTY charges 1.19%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RLTY?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.35% vs +13.40% for RLTY, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +12.91% vs +3.69% for RLTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RLTY?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 23.5% for RLTY. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RLTY -35.4%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RLTY?
QQQ and RLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RLTY?
QQQ and RLTY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 272 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RLTY?
QQQ yields 0.41% while RLTY yields 7.57%, so RLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.