PRF vs SCHD

Quick Verdict

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. PRF delivered stronger 1-year returns. PRF offers more diversification with 893 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: PRFMore Diversified: PRF

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPRFSCHDWinner
Expense Ratio0.34%0.06%
AUM$9.8B$103.7B
Dividend Yield1.37%3.31%
Holdings1,004104
YTD Return+19.29%+24.08%
1Y Return+33.89%+31.88%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.44%+14.92%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.80%+9.85%
Volatility (annualized)16.6%13.6%
Max Drawdown-61.6%-33.4%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 19, 2005Oct 20, 2011

PRF vs SCHD Performance

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PRF returned +33.89% while SCHD returned +31.88%. Year to date, PRF is up 19.29% versus a gain of 24.08% for SCHD.

Over three years, PRF compounded at +20.44% per year against +14.92% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.80% and +9.85% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PRF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.6% for PRF and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PRF charges 0.34% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $6 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRF currently yields 1.37% against 3.31% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

13.6%overlap

PRF and SCHD share 64 holdings out of 929 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PRFWeight in SCHDDifference
UNH1.36%4.54%3.18%
MRK0.79%4.32%3.53%
CVX1.13%3.95%2.82%
PGProProPro
ABTProProPro
HDProProPro
AMGNProProPro
KOProProPro
VZProProPro
COPProProPro
See all 10 holdings PRF shares with SCHD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PRF or SCHD?

PRF has an expense ratio of 0.34% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.

Which performed better, PRF or SCHD?

Over the past year PRF returned +33.89% vs +31.88% for SCHD, so PRF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), PRF annualized +9.27% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, PRF or SCHD?

PRF has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: PRF -61.6% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both PRF and SCHD?

PRF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between PRF and SCHD?

PRF and SCHD share 64 common holdings with a 13.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 929 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, PRF or SCHD?

PRF yields 1.37% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →