IVV vs PRF

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. PRF delivered stronger 1-year returns. PRF offers more diversification with 893 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: PRFMore Diversified: PRF

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPRFWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.34%
AUM$865.2B$9.8B
Dividend Yield1.09%1.37%
Holdings5081,004
YTD Return+13.52%+19.29%
1Y Return+23.63%+33.89%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.26%+20.44%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.52%+13.80%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%16.6%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-61.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 19, 2005

IVV vs PRF Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while PRF returned +33.89%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 19.29% for PRF.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.26% per year against +20.44% for PRF; over five years the annualized figures are +13.52% and +13.80% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, PRF has the edge at +9.27% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PRF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -61.6% for PRF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PRF charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $34 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.37% for PRF.

Holdings Overlap

59.8%overlap

IVV and PRF share 453 holdings out of 945 unique holdings combined, representing a 59.8% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in PRFDifference
AAPL7.44%4.01%3.43%
NVDA7.76%0.59%7.17%
GOOGL3.15%3.68%0.53%
MSFTProProPro
AMZNProProPro
METAProProPro
INTCProProPro
AVGOProProPro
JPMProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with PRF
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PRF?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PRF charges 0.34%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or PRF?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +33.89% for PRF, so PRF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +9.27% for PRF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or PRF?

PRF has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PRF -61.6%.

Should I hold both IVV and PRF?

IVV and PRF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PRF?

IVV and PRF share 453 common holdings with a 59.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 945 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PRF?

IVV yields 1.09% while PRF yields 1.37%, so PRF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →