PRF vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. PRF delivered stronger 1-year returns. PRF offers more diversification with 893 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: PRFMore Diversified: PRF

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPRFVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.34%0.04%
AUM$9.8B$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.37%2.86%
Holdings1,004568
YTD Return+18.75%+15.45%
1Y Return+33.36%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.24%+17.96%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.53%+12.54%
Volatility (annualized)16.6%14.6%
Max Drawdown-61.6%-58.8%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 19, 2005Nov 10, 2006

PRF vs VYM Performance

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRF returned +33.36% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, PRF is up 18.75% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.

Over three years, PRF compounded at +20.24% per year against +17.96% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.53% and +12.54% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PRF has the edge at +9.25% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PRF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.6% for PRF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PRF charges 0.34% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $4 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRF currently yields 1.37% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

46.1%overlap

PRF and VYM share 377 holdings out of 1074 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PRFWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO0.54%6.47%5.93%
JPM1.62%3.36%1.74%
XOM1.65%2.83%1.18%
JNJProProPro
WMTProProPro
CVXProProPro
UNHProProPro
PGProProPro
ABBVProProPro
CSCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings PRF shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PRF or VYM?

PRF has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.

Which performed better, PRF or VYM?

Over the past year PRF returned +33.36% vs +26.05% for VYM, so PRF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PRF annualized +9.25% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, PRF or VYM?

PRF has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PRF -61.6% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both PRF and VYM?

PRF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between PRF and VYM?

PRF and VYM share 377 common holdings with a 46.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1074 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, PRF or VYM?

PRF yields 1.37% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →