OMFS vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. OMFS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: OMFSMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOMFSVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%
AUM$283M$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.07%1.07%
Holdings1,1093,543
YTD Return+20.28%+13.92%
1Y Return+33.82%+24.07%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.42%+20.88%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.07%+12.47%
Volatility (annualized)21.3%15.3%
Max Drawdown-42.5%-56.6%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 8, 2017May 24, 2001

OMFS vs VTI Performance

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OMFS returned +33.82% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, OMFS is up 20.28% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.

Over three years, OMFS compounded at +13.42% per year against +20.88% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.07% and +12.47% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, OMFS has the edge at +10.57% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

OMFS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.5% for OMFS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OMFS charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFS currently yields 1.07% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

0.2%overlap

OMFS and VTI share 674 holdings out of 3018 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in OMFSWeight in VTIDifference
MYRG1.84%0.01%1.83%
FCFS1.46%0.01%1.45%
TRNO1.10%0.00%1.10%
KRYSProProPro
SLABProProPro
EATProProPro
PIPRProProPro
TVTXProProPro
ALKS:IEProProPro
RHPProProPro
See all 10 holdings OMFS shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OMFS or VTI?

OMFS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.

Which performed better, OMFS or VTI?

Over the past year OMFS returned +33.82% vs +24.07% for VTI, so OMFS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), OMFS annualized +10.57% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, OMFS or VTI?

OMFS has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OMFS -42.5% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both OMFS and VTI?

OMFS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between OMFS and VTI?

OMFS and VTI share 674 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3018 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, OMFS or VTI?

OMFS yields 1.07% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →