OMFS vs SCHD

Quick Verdict

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. OMFS delivered stronger 1-year returns. OMFS offers more diversification with 909 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: OMFSMore Diversified: OMFS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOMFSSCHDWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.06%
AUM$283M$103.7B
Dividend Yield1.07%3.31%
Holdings1,109104
YTD Return+18.30%+23.02%
1Y Return+31.61%+30.75%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.05%+14.89%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.20%+9.38%
Volatility (annualized)21.3%13.6%
Max Drawdown-42.5%-33.4%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 8, 2017Oct 20, 2011

OMFS vs SCHD Performance

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year OMFS returned +31.61% while SCHD returned +30.75%. Year to date, OMFS is up 18.30% versus a gain of 23.02% for SCHD.

Over three years, OMFS compounded at +13.05% per year against +14.89% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +7.20% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.33% annualized vs +10.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

OMFS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.5% for OMFS and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OMFS charges 0.39% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $6 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFS currently yields 1.07% against 3.31% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

1.4%overlap

OMFS and SCHD share 30 holdings out of 979 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in OMFSWeight in SCHDDifference
MC0.82%0.13%0.69%
CNS0.43%0.06%0.37%
APAM0.32%0.07%0.25%
CVBFProProPro
MURProProPro
KFYProProPro
BKEProProPro
CHCOProProPro
BANRProProPro
OFG:PRProProPro
See all 10 holdings OMFS shares with SCHD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OMFS or SCHD?

OMFS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.

Which performed better, OMFS or SCHD?

Over the past year OMFS returned +31.61% vs +30.75% for SCHD, so OMFS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), OMFS annualized +10.36% vs +11.33% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, OMFS or SCHD?

OMFS has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: OMFS -42.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both OMFS and SCHD?

OMFS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between OMFS and SCHD?

OMFS and SCHD share 30 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 979 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, OMFS or SCHD?

OMFS yields 1.07% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →