OMFS vs VOO
OMFS vs VOO
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. OMFS delivered stronger 1-year returns. OMFS offers more diversification with 909 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMFS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $283M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,109 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.28% | +13.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.82% | +23.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.07% | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
OMFS vs VOO Performance
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OMFS returned +33.82% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, OMFS is up 20.28% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.
Over three years, OMFS compounded at +13.42% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.07% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +10.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OMFS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.5% for OMFS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMFS charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFS currently yields 1.07% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMFS or VOO?
OMFS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OMFS or VOO?
Over the past year OMFS returned +33.82% vs +23.65% for VOO, so OMFS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), OMFS annualized +10.57% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OMFS or VOO?
OMFS has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: OMFS -42.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both OMFS and VOO?
OMFS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OMFS and VOO?
OMFS and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1412 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMFS or VOO?
OMFS yields 1.07% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.