OMFS vs QQQ
OMFS vs QQQ
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. OMFS delivered stronger 1-year returns. OMFS offers more diversification with 909 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMFS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $283M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 1,109 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +19.78% | +17.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.39% | +28.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.25% | +24.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.52% | +14.86% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
OMFS vs QQQ Performance
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OMFS returned +32.39% while QQQ returned +28.64%. Year to date, OMFS is up 19.78% versus a gain of 17.27% for QQQ.
Over three years, OMFS compounded at +13.25% per year against +24.88% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.52% and +14.86% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.3% for OMFS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.5% for OMFS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMFS charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFS currently yields 1.07% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
OMFS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 1012 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMFS or QQQ?
OMFS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OMFS or QQQ?
Over the past year OMFS returned +32.39% vs +28.64% for QQQ, so OMFS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), OMFS annualized +10.51% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OMFS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.3% for OMFS. Worst drawdown: OMFS -42.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both OMFS and QQQ?
OMFS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OMFS and QQQ?
OMFS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1012 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMFS or QQQ?
OMFS yields 1.07% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so OMFS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.