OALC vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. OALC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: OALCMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOALCVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%
AUM$242M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.52%1.07%
Holdings2073,543
YTD Return+18.60%+14.20%
1Y Return+28.11%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.95%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)15.5%15.3%
Max Drawdown-26.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyOneAscent InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 15, 2021May 24, 2001

OALC vs VTI Performance

OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) is a ETF from OneAscent Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OALC returned +28.11% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, OALC is up 18.60% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, OALC compounded at +22.95% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, OALC has the edge at +11.97% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

OALC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.8% for OALC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OALC charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OALC currently yields 0.52% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

54.4%overlap

OALC and VTI share 191 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 54.4% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in OALCWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA7.67%6.32%1.35%
MSFT4.88%3.81%1.07%
AMZN4.20%3.17%1.03%
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
LLYProProPro
MUProProPro
JPM:USProProPro
CSCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings OALC shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OALC or VTI?

OALC has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.

Which performed better, OALC or VTI?

Over the past year OALC returned +28.11% vs +24.16% for VTI, so OALC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), OALC annualized +11.97% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, OALC or VTI?

OALC has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OALC -26.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both OALC and VTI?

OALC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between OALC and VTI?

OALC and VTI share 191 common holdings with a 54.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, OALC or VTI?

OALC yields 0.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →