GK vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGKVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.77%0.03%
AUM$30M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.07%1.07%
Holdings323,543
YTD Return+11.96%+11.83%
1Y Return+15.68%+21.79%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.68%+20.40%
5Y Return (annualized)+2.59%+11.96%
Volatility (annualized)23.3%15.3%
Max Drawdown-47.7%-56.6%
Fund FamilyAdvisor SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 1, 2021May 24, 2001

GK vs VTI Performance

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GK returned +15.68% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, GK is up 11.96% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.

Over three years, GK compounded at +17.68% per year against +20.40% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.59% and +11.96% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs +2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.7% for GK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GK charges 0.77% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $3 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GK currently yields 0.07% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

30.5%overlap

GK and VTI share 27 holdings out of 2786 unique holdings combined, representing a 30.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GKWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA7.61%6.32%1.29%
AAPL5.27%5.84%0.57%
MU9.21%1.79%7.42%
GOOGProProPro
LLYProProPro
AVGOProProPro
MSFTProProPro
AMZNProProPro
GEVProProPro
TTProProPro
See all 10 holdings GK shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GK or VTI?

GK has an expense ratio of 0.77% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GK or VTI?

Over the past year GK returned +15.68% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GK annualized +2.91% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, GK or VTI?

GK has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GK -47.7% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both GK and VTI?

GK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between GK and VTI?

GK and VTI share 27 common holdings with a 30.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2786 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GK or VTI?

GK yields 0.07% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →