GK vs VYM
GK vs VYM
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GK | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $30M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +14.16% | +15.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.95% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.06% | +18.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.74% | +12.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -47.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GK vs VYM Performance
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GK returned +17.95% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, GK is up 14.16% versus a gain of 15.57% for VYM.
Over three years, GK compounded at +18.06% per year against +18.02% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +2.74% and +12.71% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.7% for GK and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GK charges 0.77% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $4 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GK currently yields 0.07% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GK and VYM share 5 holdings out of 583 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GK | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 5.80% | 6.47% | 0.67% |
| JPM | 1.35% | 3.36% | 2.01% |
| WMT | 1.81% | 2.44% | 0.63% |
| FCFS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| DGX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 5 holdings GK shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GK or VYM?
GK has an expense ratio of 0.77% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GK or VYM?
Over the past year GK returned +17.95% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GK annualized +3.30% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GK or VYM?
GK has been the more volatile fund at 23.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GK -47.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GK and VYM?
GK and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GK and VYM?
GK and VYM share 5 common holdings with a 9.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 583 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GK or VYM?
GK yields 0.07% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.