GK vs IVV
GK vs IVV
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $30M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.96% | +11.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.68% | +21.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.68% | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.59% | +13.02% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -47.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
GK vs IVV Performance
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GK returned +15.68% while IVV returned +21.48%. Year to date, GK is up 11.96% versus a gain of 11.54% for IVV.
Over three years, GK compounded at +17.68% per year against +20.86% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +2.59% and +13.02% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs +2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.7% for GK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GK charges 0.77% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $3 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GK currently yields 0.07% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GK and IVV share 21 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GK | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.61% | 7.76% | 0.15% |
| AAPL | 5.27% | 7.44% | 2.17% |
| MU | 9.21% | 1.69% | 7.52% |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LLY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MSFT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GEV | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings GK shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GK or IVV?
GK has an expense ratio of 0.77% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GK or IVV?
Over the past year GK returned +15.68% vs +21.48% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GK annualized +2.91% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GK or IVV?
GK has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GK -47.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GK and IVV?
GK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GK and IVV?
GK and IVV share 21 common holdings with a 32.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GK or IVV?
GK yields 0.07% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.