GK vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGKVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.77%0.03%
AUM$30M$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.07%1.09%
Holdings32509
YTD Return+14.16%+13.53%
1Y Return+17.95%+23.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.06%+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+2.74%+13.52%
Volatility (annualized)23.4%14.1%
Max Drawdown-47.7%-34.3%
Fund FamilyAdvisor SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 1, 2021Sep 7, 2010

GK vs VOO Performance

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GK returned +17.95% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, GK is up 14.16% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.

Over three years, GK compounded at +18.06% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.74% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.7% for GK and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GK charges 0.77% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $3 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GK currently yields 0.07% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

33.0%overlap

GK and VOO share 21 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 33.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GKWeight in VOODifference
NVDA7.61%7.51%0.10%
AAPL5.27%6.59%1.32%
MU9.21%2.02%7.19%
GOOGProProPro
LLYProProPro
AVGOProProPro
MSFTProProPro
AMZNProProPro
GEVProProPro
TTProProPro
See all 10 holdings GK shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GK or VOO?

GK has an expense ratio of 0.77% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GK or VOO?

Over the past year GK returned +17.95% vs +23.65% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GK annualized +3.30% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, GK or VOO?

GK has been the more volatile fund at 23.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GK -47.7% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both GK and VOO?

GK and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between GK and VOO?

GK and VOO share 21 common holdings with a 33.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GK or VOO?

GK yields 0.07% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →