FLDZ vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLDZVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.40%0.03%
AUM$4M$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.42%1.07%
Holdings3173,543
YTD Return+10.75%+13.39%
1Y Return+11.88%+23.21%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.25%+20.65%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.18%
Volatility (annualized)16.4%15.3%
Max Drawdown-19.5%-56.6%
Fund FamilyTrueSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 31, 2021May 24, 2001

FLDZ vs VTI Performance

TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF (FLDZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLDZ returned +11.88% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, FLDZ is up 10.75% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.

Over three years, FLDZ compounded at +12.25% per year against +20.65% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FLDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for FLDZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLDZ charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLDZ currently yields 1.42% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

2.4%overlap

FLDZ and VTI share 45 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FLDZWeight in VTIDifference
GE1.65%0.54%1.11%
RTX1.82%0.35%1.47%
PLTR1.70%0.35%1.35%
LMTProProPro
HWMProProPro
VVXProProPro
CDREProProPro
HXLProProPro
GDProProPro
HIIProProPro
See all 10 holdings FLDZ shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLDZ or VTI?

FLDZ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FLDZ or VTI?

Over the past year FLDZ returned +11.88% vs +23.21% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FLDZ annualized +6.64% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FLDZ or VTI?

FLDZ has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLDZ -19.5% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both FLDZ and VTI?

FLDZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FLDZ and VTI?

FLDZ and VTI share 45 common holdings with a 2.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLDZ or VTI?

FLDZ yields 1.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FLDZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →