FLDZ vs SCHD
FLDZ vs SCHD
TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLDZ | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $4M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.42% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 317 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +13.10% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.32% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.17% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
FLDZ vs SCHD Performance
TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF (FLDZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FLDZ returned +14.32% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, FLDZ is up 13.10% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, FLDZ compounded at +13.17% per year against +15.08% for SCHD. Across the full 5-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for FLDZ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLDZ charges 0.40% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $6 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLDZ currently yields 1.42% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
FLDZ and SCHD share 1 holdings out of 161 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLDZ | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMT | 1.83% | 2.66% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLDZ or SCHD?
FLDZ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLDZ or SCHD?
Over the past year FLDZ returned +14.32% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FLDZ annualized +7.12% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLDZ or SCHD?
FLDZ has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FLDZ -19.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FLDZ and SCHD?
FLDZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLDZ and SCHD?
FLDZ and SCHD share 1 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 161 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLDZ or SCHD?
FLDZ yields 1.42% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.