FLDZ vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLDZIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.40%0.03%
AUM$4M$865.2B
Dividend Yield1.42%1.09%
Holdings317508
YTD Return+10.02%+13.31%
1Y Return+10.76%+24.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.01%+21.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)16.4%15.1%
Max Drawdown-19.5%-56.5%
Fund FamilyTrueSharesiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 31, 2021May 15, 2000

FLDZ vs IVV Performance

TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF (FLDZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FLDZ returned +10.76% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, FLDZ is up 10.02% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.

Over three years, FLDZ compounded at +12.01% per year against +21.16% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +6.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FLDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for FLDZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLDZ charges 0.40% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLDZ currently yields 1.42% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

2.3%overlap

FLDZ and IVV share 12 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FLDZWeight in IVVDifference
RTX1.82%0.40%1.42%
GE1.65%0.55%1.10%
PLTR1.70%0.47%1.23%
LMTProProPro
HWMProProPro
GDProProPro
HIIProProPro
NOCProProPro
LHXProProPro
TXTProProPro
See all 10 holdings FLDZ shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLDZ or IVV?

FLDZ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FLDZ or IVV?

Over the past year FLDZ returned +10.76% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FLDZ annualized +6.49% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FLDZ or IVV?

FLDZ has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FLDZ -19.5% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both FLDZ and IVV?

FLDZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FLDZ and IVV?

FLDZ and IVV share 12 common holdings with a 2.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLDZ or IVV?

FLDZ yields 1.42% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FLDZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →