FLDZ vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLDZVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.40%0.03%
AUM$4M$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.42%1.09%
Holdings317509
YTD Return+13.10%+13.80%
1Y Return+14.32%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.17%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)16.7%14.1%
Max Drawdown-19.5%-34.3%
Fund FamilyTrueSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 31, 2021Sep 7, 2010

FLDZ vs VOO Performance

TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF (FLDZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLDZ returned +14.32% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, FLDZ is up 13.10% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, FLDZ compounded at +13.17% per year against +21.50% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FLDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for FLDZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLDZ charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLDZ currently yields 1.42% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

2.3%overlap

FLDZ and VOO share 12 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FLDZWeight in VOODifference
GE1.65%0.60%1.05%
RTX1.82%0.40%1.42%
PLTR1.70%0.42%1.28%
LMTProProPro
HWMProProPro
GDProProPro
HIIProProPro
NOCProProPro
LHXProProPro
TXTProProPro
See all 10 holdings FLDZ shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLDZ or VOO?

FLDZ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FLDZ or VOO?

Over the past year FLDZ returned +14.32% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FLDZ annualized +7.12% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FLDZ or VOO?

FLDZ has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLDZ -19.5% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both FLDZ and VOO?

FLDZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FLDZ and VOO?

FLDZ and VOO share 12 common holdings with a 2.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLDZ or VOO?

FLDZ yields 1.42% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FLDZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →