CATH vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCATHVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.29%0.03%
AUM$1.3B$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.77%1.07%
Holdings4483,543
YTD Return+8.31%+10.14%
1Y Return+16.31%+19.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.70%+18.94%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.44%+11.79%
Volatility (annualized)15.6%15.4%
Max Drawdown-34.0%-56.6%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 18, 2016May 24, 2001

CATH vs VTI Performance

Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CATH returned +16.31% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, CATH is up 8.31% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.

Over three years, CATH compounded at +17.70% per year against +18.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.44% and +11.79% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CATH has the edge at +13.65% annualized vs +7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CATH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for CATH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CATH charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CATH currently yields 0.77% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

34.4%overlap

CATH and VTI share 384 holdings out of 2814 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CATHWeight in VTIDifference
LRCX7.81%0.74%7.07%
GE6.84%0.54%6.30%
NVDA0.02%6.32%6.30%
AAPLProProPro
CSCOProProPro
GILDProProPro
MSFTProProPro
PGProProPro
MAProProPro
AMZNProProPro
See all 10 holdings CATH shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CATH or VTI?

CATH has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CATH or VTI?

Over the past year CATH returned +16.31% vs +19.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CATH annualized +13.65% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CATH or VTI?

CATH has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CATH -34.0% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both CATH and VTI?

CATH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between CATH and VTI?

CATH and VTI share 384 common holdings with a 34.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2814 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CATH or VTI?

CATH yields 0.77% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →